There are other ways to introduce business rules in the model than using state machines and guards. You can also use constraints. The model already has a lot of implicit constraints from the cardinalities of the association ends. Like if you have checcardinalityf 1..4 and you have zero objects in that relation – then you have broken constraint.

But you may also define you own constraints:

You can choose if a broken constraint (a constraint that evaluates to false) should be treated as Information, Warning or a Error to the user.

You can also define the constraint as being a delete constraint only:

This way have explained at the model level that the domain does not consider it to be ok to delete a Car-object as long as we have the deposit – unless it is in state Scrapped.

The delete constraints will be checked when is Deleted by MDriven – as a result of the Delete operator is executed on the class.

Other things that are checked when the Delete operator is run are the BusinessDeleteRules that exists on all association endpoints:

We as modelers should decide what the best rule is for each association end. In this case – is it ok to delete a Brand if there are Cars left in the AllCarsOfThisBrand association? No I think not. I am setting it to “MustBeEmpty”.

The association in the other direct on the other hand

I set that to “NeedNotBeEmptyNoWarning” – because deleting a car-object is ok even if it has a brand.